519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Published on: 5 Feb 2014 By

A Good Day for Investors: The Ontario Court of Appeal Fixes the Timminco Problem

On February 3, 2014, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision Green v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. This decision set aside the Court’s previous interpretation of the leave process under Part XXIII.1 of the Ontario Securities Act with respect to the limitation period. In doing…

View the post titled A Good Day for Investors: The Ontario Court of Appeal Fixes the Timminco Problem
Published on: 4 Feb 2014 By (Dianne Saxe)

Waste Diversion groups can sit uncomfortably with the Competition Act

The industry funding organizations used to provide, or to fund, waste diversion can have anti-competitive effects. There is a natural tendency for large companies with market power to use that power to design waste diversion programs and organizations in their own interest and to create obst…

View the post titled Waste Diversion groups can sit uncomfortably with the Competition Act
Published on: 30 Jan 2014 By (Dianne Saxe)

Should roadbed slag count as battery recycling?

Waste Diversion Ontario is considering a proposal by Call2Recycle Canada to take over battery recycling from Ontario’s existing Consolidated Municipal Hazardous Solid Waste (CMHSW) diversion program under the Waste Diversion Act, 2002. Ontario’s battery recyclers (including our client)…

View the post titled Should roadbed slag count as battery recycling?
Published on: 29 Jan 2014 By (Dianne Saxe)

Supreme Court: Honest efforts to understand the law are not enough

The Supreme Court of Canada has made compliance with ambiguous regulations tougher than ever, by ruling that honest efforts to understand the law (however confusing) are not enough. In La Souveraine, Compagnie d’assurance générale v. Autorité des marchés financiers, Sovereign General (SG) wa…

View the post titled Supreme Court: Honest efforts to understand the law are not enough
Published on: 29 Jan 2014 By

The Supreme Court of Canada Provides Guidance on Preferable Procedure and Access to Justice

On December 12, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in AIC Limited v Fischer, 2013 SCC 69, which provides very useful guidance on the preferable procedure requirement for certification, particularly on the meaning of access to justice in the preferability analysis. On Dec…

View the post titled The Supreme Court of Canada Provides Guidance on Preferable Procedure and Access to Justice