519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Published on: 15 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Air pollution: They're cleaner than you think?

Ontario’s air pollution regulation, 419/05, uses an American computer model to estimate how much air pollution from a stationary source reaches a point of impingement, usually the property boundary. This model, AERMOD, is used to determine whether organizations are complying with air e…

View the post titled Air pollution: They're cleaner than you think?
Published on: 14 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

A new twist on anti-wind litigation: the Charter

Because of the social, environmental, and political importance of reducing carbon emissions and switching to renewable sources of energy, the Environmental Protection Act requires wind opponents to show that a renewable energy project will cause serious harm to human health, or serious and i…

View the post titled A new twist on anti-wind litigation: the Charter
Published on: 10 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Fine for breach of court order to cleanup waste

A Toronto company was fined $45,000 plus victim fine surcharges of $11,250 for failing to comply with a Court Order to remove waste materials from a mill site. 2023682 Ontario Inc. operate a mill site in Coleman Township. The company was originally convicted of failing to comply with a Minis…

View the post titled Fine for breach of court order to cleanup waste
Published on: 9 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Energy transparency in Ontario public schools, a small step in the right direction

Congratulations to Gord Miller, Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner. Hours after he chided the province for concealing energy consumption information in public buildings, the province announced that energy consumption information for schools will be made public by July 1. It’s a…

View the post titled Energy transparency in Ontario public schools, a small step in the right direction
Published on: 9 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Dust from asphalt plant triggers $81,250 penalty

Ingram Asphalt Inc. was fined $65,000 plus victim fine surcharges of $16,250 for discharging dust and particulate adversely impacting the surrounding environment and community. The company failed to notify the ministry of the dust emissions and did not comply with conditions of a ministry order.

View the post titled Dust from asphalt plant triggers $81,250 penalty
Published on: 7 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Strong opposition to sewage processing facility foiled by filing error

Lystek’s controversial sewage sludge processing facility in Southgate, Ontario, will not face an appeal of its Environmental Compliance Approvals, because opponents, after fighting the facility for so long, made a critical error in seeking leave to appeal. See Green v. Ontario.

View the post titled Strong opposition to sewage processing facility foiled by filing error
Published on: 2 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

New rules for boreholes and other test wells

The Ministry of the Environment is seeking public comment on a draft manual on test holes and dewatering wells. A “test hole” is a type of “well” that is made to obtain information about groundwater, and is not used or intended for use as a source of water for consumption. It includes virtua…

View the post titled New rules for boreholes and other test wells