519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Showing 231 - 240 of 957
Published on: 5 Sep 2012 By (Dianne Saxe)

Contaminated site lawsuit: How not to win

Owners of a contaminated site are often too optimistic about their “rights” to compensation. Sometimes, chasing compensation for contamination just throws good money after bad. For example, Terrim Properties Ltd. wanted to build a gaming centre in Castlegar, B.C.  Their loan fell through when the groundwater proved to be contaminated, likely due to historic gasoline...

Continue reading the post titled Contaminated site lawsuit: How not to win
Published on: 12 Jun 2012 By (Dianne Saxe)

Financial Assurance after business closes

An MOE order for financial assurance can be enforced even after the business has closed and been evicted from its premises, and even without a full hearing by the Environmental Review Tribunal. The ERT had enough evidence to know that the cleanup would cost much more than the existing financial assurance, so dismissed the operators’...

Continue reading the post titled Financial Assurance after business closes
Published on: 26 Sep 2007 By

General Chemical Canada: Another Orphan Site

Contaminated sites continue to keep the courts busy. This month, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed a secured creditor to take $3.75 million out of a bankrupt firm, despite MOE objections that the money was needed to cleanup the bankrupt’s pollution. In Harbert Distressed Investment Fund v. General Chemical Canada, GCCL was a bankrupt chemical...

Continue reading the post titled General Chemical Canada: Another Orphan Site
Published on: 30 May 2011 By (Dianne Saxe)

Brownfield Regulation amended

The Ministry of the Environment has amended Ontario Regulation 153/04, under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA), related to brownfields. According to the MOE, the amendments “are technical and are consistent with the policy intent of the existing O. Reg. 153/04, as amended in December 2009. The amendments clarify the intent and scope of certain provisions,...

Continue reading the post titled Brownfield Regulation amended
Published on: 28 May 2019 By ,

Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario: Ontario Court of Appeal provides guidance on breadth of the Regulated Conduct Defence

On April 17, 2019 the Court of Appeal of Ontario released its decision in Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2019 ONCA 305 [Hughes]. The Court of Appeal’s decision provides guidance to counsel on the scope of the Regulated Conduct Defence (the “RCD”). The RCD is a defence in the Competition Act that can...

Continue reading the post titled Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario: Ontario Court of Appeal provides guidance on breadth of the Regulated Conduct Defence