519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Published on: 16 Apr 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Environmental Tribunal blocks afterthought grounds for leave to appeal

Ontario’s Environmental Review Tribunal has refused to allow a developer to completely change its proposed grounds for seeking leave to appeal an Environmental Compliance Approval given to an existing industry, under the Environmental Bill of Rights and the Environmental Protection Act…

View the post titled Environmental Tribunal blocks afterthought grounds for leave to appeal
Published on: 25 Feb 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

It is now an environmental offence to kill birds with buildings

Ecojustice has done another important public service by prosecuting Cadillac Fairview for slaughtering migratory birds, including endangered species, with a particularly lethal set of mirrored buildings, the Yonge Corporate Centre (“YCC”) office buildings in Toronto. According to Judge Melvy…

View the post titled It is now an environmental offence to kill birds with buildings
Published on: 1 Feb 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

New air standards in effect: Reg. 419/05 bites today

A major tightening of air pollution emission standards comes into force today for many Ontario industries. Regulation 419/05, under the Environmental Protection Act, bases air pollution standards on avoiding local impacts to human health and the environment, NOT on what is economically or te…

View the post titled New air standards in effect: Reg. 419/05 bites today
Published on: 16 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Chemtura fined $150,000 for air pollution leak

As environmental fines continue to increase, Chemtura Canada Inc. was fined $150,000, plus the victim fine surcharge of $37,500, for spilling sulphuric acid mist into the air, contrary to the Environmental Protection Act. Chemtura’s Toronto manufacturing facility produces sulfonates an…

View the post titled Chemtura fined $150,000 for air pollution leak
Published on: 9 Jan 2013 By (Dianne Saxe)

Dust from asphalt plant triggers $81,250 penalty

Ingram Asphalt Inc. was fined $65,000 plus victim fine surcharges of $16,250 for discharging dust and particulate adversely impacting the surrounding environment and community. The company failed to notify the ministry of the dust emissions and did not comply with conditions of a ministry order.

View the post titled Dust from asphalt plant triggers $81,250 penalty
Published on: 19 Nov 2012 By (Dianne Saxe)

Waterpower projects can't be reviewed because they don't get review?

So, waterpower development can't be reviewed by the ERT, because it gets only minimal scrutiny under the Environmental Assessment Act. Given the substantial adverse environmental impacts that waterpower development can have, it is incongruous to exempt it so fully from public review.

View the post titled Waterpower projects can't be reviewed because they don't get review?