519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Published on: 16 Jan 2015 By

Filtres

En quoi consiste ce recours collectif? Dans ce recours collectif, il est allégué que les défendeurs ont comploté de façon illégale afin de fixer, augmenter, et/ou maintenir les prix des filtres à carburant, d’huile, d’air, et de transmission vendus en tant que filtres de rechanges pour des a…

View the post titled Filtres
Published on: 16 Jan 2015 By

Mémoire Flash

Flash Memory This class action alleges that the Defendants unlawfully conspired to fix, increase, and/or maintain prices at which Flash Memory or products containing Flash Memory were sold in Canada. The plaintiffs allege that from at least January 1, 1999 through to the present, the defenda…

View the post titled Mémoire Flash
Published on: 16 Jan 2015 By

Méthionine

Methionine Conspiracy to fix the prices of Methionine Dans ce recours collectif, il est allégué que certains fabricants ont comploté afin de fixer le prix de vente de la Méthionine au Canada et sur le plan mondial, depuis au moins 1985 jusqu’à 1998. La Méthionine est un acide aminé qui est u…

View the post titled Méthionine
Published on: 16 Jan 2015 By

Polyols de polyéther

En quoi consiste ce recours collectif? Dans le recours collectif des Polyols de Polyéther, il est allégué que les défenderesses ont comploté de façon illégale afin de fixer, d’augmenter, et/ou maintenir les prix des Polyols de Polyéther dans le marché. L’expression «Produits de Polyols de Po…

View the post titled Polyols de polyéther
Published on: 28 Oct 2014 By

Consumer Protection Class Actions – Obtaining recovery for unfair business practices where individual damages are small

In Ontario, class actions are a mechanism for groups of people to seek justice. In this article, Elizabeth deBoer looks at how the Consumer Protection Act plays a role in class actions and provides examples of situations where the public can use this legislation to access justice. The Ontari…

View the post titled Consumer Protection Class Actions – Obtaining recovery for unfair business practices where individual damages are small
Published on: 22 Sep 2014 By

A Missed Opportunity: The Supreme Court Declines Leave to Appeal in Wakelam v. Wyeth Consumer Healthcare

The Supreme Court has declined leave to appeal in Wakelam v. Wyeth Consumer Healthcare. The decision means that the far-reaching findings of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in the areas of consumer protection, competition and restitution law, are permitted to stand. It also means that a…

View the post titled A Missed Opportunity: The Supreme Court Declines Leave to Appeal in Wakelam v. Wyeth Consumer Healthcare
Published on: 14 Jul 2014 By

A Case Study in the Protection of Class Members’ Rights: Forthcoming Compensation for Residential Schools Survivors

In Canada, class actions are supervised closely by the courts, which are obligated to protect the rights of absent class members. Accordingly, all of the major steps in class actions litigation require court approval. If there are questions about the conduct of a class action, affected parti…

View the post titled A Case Study in the Protection of Class Members’ Rights: Forthcoming Compensation for Residential Schools Survivors
Published on: 2 Jul 2014 By

Basic’s Alive – The Judicial Oak Weathers the Storm

For over 20 years, securities class actions in the U.S. have relied on the ‘fraud-on-the-market’ theory of reliance for investors. This was established by the 1988 case Basic Inc v Levinson. Recently some have question this theory. Earlier this week the Supreme Court released its decision in…

View the post titled Basic’s Alive – The Judicial Oak Weathers the Storm