519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Published on: 9 Mar 2015 By (Dianne Saxe)

Environmental Tribunal rejects two more anti-wind appeals

The Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal has rejected two more anti-wind appeals, Cham Shan Temple v. Director, Ministry of the Environment (13-140) and County of Lambton v. Director, Ministry of the Environment (14-065). Citing the Divisional Court decisions in Dixon v Director, the Tribun…

View the post titled Environmental Tribunal rejects two more anti-wind appeals
Published on: 3 Mar 2015 By (Dianne Saxe)

More cities adopting stormwater fees: you pave, you pay

In 2011,  we wrote about the innovative stormwater fee adopted by Kitchener, Ontario, following English and American precedents. Instead of funding storm water management through fees for municipal water, which penalizes heavy water users such as laundries, these municipalities fund the cost…

View the post titled More cities adopting stormwater fees: you pave, you pay
Published on: 17 Feb 2015 By (Dianne Saxe)

Another anti-wind appeal dismissed by Tribunal

The Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal has dismissed yet another anti-wind appeal, in 14-059 GILLESPIE V. MOE. This upholds the renewable energy approval issued to the Goshen Wind Energy Centre, up to 63 wind turbines, with a generation capacity of 102 megawatts, located in Bluewater and …

View the post titled Another anti-wind appeal dismissed by Tribunal
Published on: 23 Jan 2015 By (Dianne Saxe)

Supreme Court hears Chevron Ecuador pollution appeal

Can foreign pollution judgments be enforced in Canada? The Supreme Court of Canada has heard arguments on the attempt by Ecuador pollution plaintiffs to enforce their $9 plus billion Ecuador judgment against Chevron’s Canadian assets, in Chevron Corporation, et al. v. Daniel Carlos Lus…

View the post titled Supreme Court hears Chevron Ecuador pollution appeal