519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

We are frequently consulted on disputes over the wording of contracts between environmental engineers and their clients.  Some contracts are just badly drafted, so it’s hard to know what they mean. Others are clearly drafted, but don’t describe what the client was promised. Some deprive clients of virtually all meaningful remedies for shoddy work.

One common problem is limitation of liability clauses. Many engineering firms put in their contracts clauses that limit their liability to the lesser of, say, $50,000 or their fees, whichever is less, no matter how badly they perform. For many contaminated sites in the GTA, $50,000 is just not a meaningful amount of money; it is rarely enough to complete the work that the client had already paid for.

When a client hires a professional to do a highly important job, and pays for that job, they expect to be able to rely on the result. This is particularly important when large amounts of money are at stake. But under many engineering consulting contracts, the consequences of an engineer’s negligence fall almost entirely on the client.

Powerful clients, like banks and the federal government, simply won’t sign these sorts of contracts. But individuals and small to medium sized businesses often do. It creates injustice, and it creates litigation. Hiring an engineer is not simply a question of filling out a standard form. It involves a serious decision on the allocation of risk, which the parties should realize they are making.

For this reason, I struck a committee of the Ontario Bar Association and the Association of Consulting Engineers, to develop a model environmental consulting contract that lawyers, engineers, and their clients could use.  If they do, the parties will have to discuss and agree on critical risk allocation issues, such as limitations of liability, insurance, the cost of extras such as surface treatment restoration, etc.   If clients want extra liability protection, such as extra insurance or higher liability limits,  they may have to pay  higher premiums to get it. Any paragraph that is entitled “mutual indemnity” will actually be mutual, instead of the usual one-sided language. Wouldn’t that be an improvement?

To read the draft model contract, click Draft Model Agreement for Environmental Engineers and their Clients.

News & Views


The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

Consumer class actions and products to watch for

Class actions can be a way to hold large companies to account when their products fall short…

The case for punitive damages

In the realm of injury law, the term “punitive damages” often emerges, surrounde…