Health Canada just published the results of its survey of bisphenol A (BPA) in canned drink products. Seventy-two canned soft drink products (all carbonated except for four tea products), representing a Canadian market share of 84% or more, were analysed for BPA. Health Canada isn’t concerned; should you be?
The assay method could detect 0.045 mcg/L (note: 1 mcg/L = 1 part per billion). Two samples of each product were analysed (each sample was divided into two subsamples) and the results averaged.
BPA was detected in samples from all but two products; the exceptions were tonic water products containing quinine, a chemical that may interfere with the BPA assay. BPA concentrations were reported as being “low” – ie.,
- < 0.5 mcg/L (75% of products);
- < 1 mcg/L (85% of products);
- average BPA concentration (all products): 0.57 mcg/L
Take a look at the Table that accompanies the study – find how much BPA is in your favourite brand of pop!
Health Canada opines that the range of concentrations (0.032 – 4.5 mcg/L) could be due to differences in the coatings of the drink cans (e.g., type used, amount) or sterilization conditions (e.g., temperature, length of time) used by the different companies. The report also suggests that exposure of the cans to sunlight (e.g., during storage) could increase the concentration of BPA that leaches into the drinks.
Health Canada tells us not to worry. The provisional tolerable daily intake (TDI ) is 25 mcg/kg of body weight per day. Health Canada provides a nice calculation that indicates that to reach this TDI, the average 60 kg adult would have to drink 940 cans of soft drinks per day. But take a look at a few of our calculations, below, based on a higher intake of sodas with higher BPA concentrations.
Why are we concerned?
- Health Canada tells us that this is a “snapshot” of what’s in the drinks – i.e., perhaps not a representative sample. What would a more comprehensive study reveal?
- Is Health Canada’s safety limit (TDI) robust? Some authors suggest that much lower concentration thresholds need to be set, as even very low concentrations of BPA could be harmful.
- What are the reasons for the huge range in BPA concentrations in the various products? Can liners? Exposure to heat or sunlight during storage? Something else?
- Why should consumer products like canned drinks contain any chemicals like BPA?
- Remember that soft drinks are just one source of BPA – we are being exposed to this chemical through many other consumer products.
In our September blog about BPA, we wrote that one of missing pieces of the BPA puzzle is how much BPA is actually present in consumer products – it is encouraging that studies like this one are being done and reported to the public. In October 2008, we reported that the federal government had decided to take a precautionary approach in characterizing the risk from BPA. But is that really what they’re doing with soft drinks?
What are we drinking?
Here’s Health Canada’s calculation for a 60 kg person
But what if the person drank 6 cans of the more BPA-laden soda each day? A couple of brands of soda contained BPA in a concentration of 1.1 mcg/L:
A couple of brands of soda contained BPA in a concentration of over 4 mcg/L – the highest concentration was 4.5 mcg/L:
And some of us weigh less than 60 kg.; for smaller people, the effect would be worse.
For more information:
Health Canada’s Survey of BPA in canned drink products. March 2009:1-8. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/securit/bpa_survey-enquete-can-eng.pdf
Update on Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan (includes Bisphenol A) – to January 30, 2009:
BPA research & monitoring activities: This site mentions a targetted survey of BPA in packaged drink products (e.g., glass, plastics, cans – includes soft drink products)