519 672 2121

We are shocked and devastated by the senseless crime motivated by hatred and racism that was committed in our community on June 6. We extend our deepest condolences to the friends and family of those who were killed, and wish a full recovery to the surviving young boy who remains in hospital. We stand in solidarity with our Muslim partners, colleagues, clients, friends, and neighbours in rejecting Islamophobia in all forms, and demanding better for our community. Hatred has no place here. It diminishes every one of us. Each of us shares the responsibility for putting an end to it. We recognize that as members of the legal profession, our share of that responsibility is heightened. This unspeakable crime strikes at the very core of the Muslim community’s sense of security and will have a lasting impact. Although this tragedy can never be undone, we believe the goodness in our city will prevail. We commit to be better for each other, to demand better from each other and to share love, kindness and tolerance with one another. We must stand together to build a safer, more inclusive community for all.

Close mobile menu

Dianne Saxe delivered a presentation to the American Bar Association on July 22, providing a comprehensive overview of wind litigation in Ontario since the Green Energy Act came into effect.

She traced a number of trends in the types of wind cases that are being brought before the Environmental Review Tribunal (including the persistent failure of challenges to wind approvals, especially those based on human health concerns, and the wave of constitutional challenges that followed initial failed challenges based on purely statutory grounds and which may now be petering out). She also discussed several of the more interesting and unusual cases, most of which we have written about before, including Cham Shan Temple v Director (whether turbines violated the Charter rights of pilgrims who might be distracted when potentially passing them by en route to a temple), Dixon v Director (whether the statutory test opponents are required to pass violates their section 7 Charter rights), Fata v Director (whether potential interference with weather forecasting equipment would cause “serious harm” to human health), and the Ostrander Point proceedings (the drawn-out saga involving Blandings turtles, roads, and a bird sanctuary, among characters). She also highlighted some recent and unfolding developments, such as the fact that wind appeals are beginning to settle, the nocebo effect, and recent findings from Health Canada about the effects of wind turbines on human health.

You can find a copy of her presentation here: Dianne Saxe_Ontario Wind Farm Litigation

News & Views


The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

The future of remote work: Important employer considerations

For many employers, the last 15 months has been a forced experiment on whether large segment…

Class actions as clone wars?

Ontario Court rejects notion that class members must be “clones.” Judges on a certification …