519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

MacQueen v Nova Scotia, the Sydney Tar Ponds class action, is still mired in wrangling over the proper definition of the class. Last fall, the plaintiffs were hopeful that certification was just around the corner, and proposed a revised, narrower class definition for the court’s approval. The defendants, the Attorneys General of Canada and Nova Scotia, continue to raise numerous objections about the proposed class definition. There was a further court hearing in December, and written submissions were exchanged well into January.

Past and present neighbours of the famous Tar Ponds are suing both governments for damages, for property loss and for battery because they were exposed to contaminants from the ponds.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

The meaning of “consent” – the focal point of the Hockey Canada case

The legal definition of consent is clear: it must be a voluntary, affirmative, and ongoing a…

Injured in a car accident while working? WSIB may not be your only option

If you’re injured in a car accident while working in Ontario, you might be surprised to lear…