519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

MacQueen v Nova Scotia, the Sydney Tar Ponds class action, is still mired in wrangling over the proper definition of the class. Last fall, the plaintiffs were hopeful that certification was just around the corner, and proposed a revised, narrower class definition for the court’s approval. The defendants, the Attorneys General of Canada and Nova Scotia, continue to raise numerous objections about the proposed class definition. There was a further court hearing in December, and written submissions were exchanged well into January.

Past and present neighbours of the famous Tar Ponds are suing both governments for damages, for property loss and for battery because they were exposed to contaminants from the ponds.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

What is a material change in Canadian franchise disclosure—and when must it be disclosed?

A foreign franchisor has delivered a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document to a promising …

When a brain injury becomes “catastrophic” under Ontario accident benefits law

A serious traumatic brain injury can affect far more than a person’s physical health. …