Bridget Moran

Bridget is an associate lawyer in Siskinds’ class actions department. Based in Siskinds’ London office, her practice is focused on representing plaintiffs in complex price-fixing, consumer protection, and product liability litigation.  

At Siskinds, Bridget is part of the team responsible for some of Canada’s largest price-fixing settlements, including in cases related to auto parts ($185 million), the foreign exchange market ($134 million), liquid crystal display panels ($83 million), and cathode ray tubes ($49 million).  

Bridget has also been counsel on precedent setting cases, including the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Pioneer Corp. v Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42, which decided important issues for plaintiffs, including whether discoverability applies to s. 36 of the Competition Act, and whether “umbrella purchasers” (i.e., persons who purchased the relevant product from a non-cartel member) have a cause of action under the Competition Act.

Before law school, Bridget received her B.A. in political economy from the University of California Berkeley, where she was a member of the varsity rowing team. She obtained her J.D. from Western University in 2014 and was called to the Bar in 2015 after completing her articles at Siskinds.

Middlesex Law Association, Member
Law Society of Ontario, Member

Bridget Moran has been selected by her peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers™ in Canada: Ones to Watch from 2022 to 2024.

Couple takes legal action against Toronto fertility clinic over damaged eggs, embryos
Umbrella Purchasers: The Plaintiffs' Perspective
Hot Topics: Key Issues and Trends in Competition, Securities and Privacy Law

• Large foodborne illness outbreak linked to Cantaloupe contaminated with Salmonella
• McLean v. Canada (Attorney General) highlights the importance of filing a timely claim for compensation in a class action
• I am affected by a class action. How does compensation work?
• What can I do if I disagree with a class action settlement?
• How do I join a class action?
• Courts reject “improvident” settlement in CHL class actions
• Godfrey v Sony: Supreme Court protects victims of price-fixing conspiracies
• Year in Review – Umbrella Purchasers
• ONCA holds that umbrella purchasers have a cause of action in a price-fixing class action
• Update: SCC Grants Leave to Appeal on Umbrella Purchaser Issue
• Court Grants Leave to Appeal on Umbrella Purchaser Issue
• Court of Appeal Hears Jurisdiction Motion in Airia Brands
• Ontario Court of Appeal Helps Ensure Conspirators are Held Accountable for their Wrongdoing