519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

Ontario’s latest contaminated site decision is Kipfinch v. Westwood Mall (Mississauga) Limited. The  intended purchaser of a $25 million shopping mall was unable to obtain financing after the vendor refused to allow invasive testing in an area formerly occupied by a dry cleaner.

 

The agreement of purchase and sale required the purchaser to satisfy itself of the environmental conditions of the property, but allowed the vendor to refuse to permit unduly invasive testing. The vendor refused to permit wells to be drilled in the retail area of the mall, even at night. Held, the vendor’s refusal was unreasonable, given the proximity of this area to the dry cleaning operation and the limited impact the testing would have. The Purchaser thereby lost a 50% chance of making a $660,000 profit, and was awarded $333,000 plus costs.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

Neurological imaging to prove brain injury in medical negligence litigation

A brain injury is when cell death occurs in the brain, which can affect an individual’s capa…

Take note: employers may be responsible for paying CPP and EI premiums on employee tips and gratuities

According to a recent Federal Court of Appeal decision, employers who receive electronic tip…