519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

If passed in substantially its present form, the US GHG reporting rule will have its largest immediate effects on exports of fossil fuels from Canada to the US. All fossil fuel importers will have to report the total GHGs that will be released when the imported products are burned. (To the probable relief of oil sands producers, that mandatory reporting will not include GHG emitted in Canada to produce the fossil fuels.) It may also become more difficult to sell products into the US, without comparable reporting.

In the longer term, Canada may have to upgrade our modest reporting regime.  The EPA suggests that a less comprehensive reporting regime (such as Canada’s) does not provide the data necessary to effectively regulate the carbon footprint of a modern economy. The US expects to collect GHG reports from 13,205 entities, compared to the mere 350 that report in Canada, and to capture 55% of total emissions. The US expects its reporting regime to cost$138 million (based on average costs over the first three years) in monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting costs that will be widely distributed through the economy. Impacts of the costs on individual sectors and entities are expected to be generally small, comprising less than 1% of entity receipts and approximately 0.001% of 2007 GDP.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

Bill C-230–A time for change

On February 26, 2020, Bill C-230, a private member’s bill, was introduced by Nova Scotia MP …

What if Britney Spears lived in Ontario? Examining agency and guardianships in Ontario

Britney Spears’ conservatorship, and the resulting “Free Britney” movement, has been a topic…