519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

Health Canada has released its new Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, prepared by the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water (CDW).[1] This replaces the existing 1996 edition. Bottom line: the numbers are a little stricter than 15 years ago.

The summary document provides an excellent overview of developments in drinking water protection over the past 15 years, and a helpful review how changes to the guidelines are made.

Below, we briefly review the updated guidelines and discuss the process (and documents) used to establish guidelines on a formal and informal basis.

Some background

These health-based guidelines have been developed for several chemicals (including by-products of disinfection), micro-organisms and physical substances found in Canadian drinking water supplies. As well, the guidelines consider aesthetic effects (e.g., taste, odour and colour) and treatment processes/technologies (e.g., water turbidity can interfere with chlorination, while pipe corrosion affects drinking water infrastructure).

Provinces and territories may adopt some or all of these guidelines, either as guidance documents or by regulation as enforceable drinking water standards. In Ontario, for example, the drinking water quality standard for arsenic is 0.025 mg/L. In 2007, the province noted that it would review this standard, citing the more stringent Health Canada guidelines, which had in 2006 adopted a standard of 0.01 mg/L.[2] Ontario’s arsenic standard did not change. On the other hand, Nova Scotia adopted the federal guidelines (as these are amended from time to time) as binding standards in 2000.[3]

Highlights of the 2010 Guideline

The 2010 summary highlights some parameters for which Guidelines have been issued or revised since the 1996 edition. For example, acceptable turbidity values are now provided according to the type of filtration system used (as opposed to a single figure used in the earlier Guideline). More stringent maximum acceptable concentrations (MAC) have been introduced for some parameters, including arsenic, uranium and some radioactive isotopes. The MAC for trichloroethylene, a solvent used mainly in metal degreasing operations and enters our water supply through industrial effluents, was lowered by a factor of 10 in 2005, [4] based on extensive scientific review of risk of cancer and adverse reproductive effects.[5] As well, where no guideline values existed in 1996 for some parameters, these are now in place, e.g., for antimony, bromate, chlorate, chlorite, haloacetic acids.

Following a systematic review of older guidelines, the updated guideline reaffirms the current guidelines for more than 40 parameters (e.g., several chemicals, as well as taste and temperature) and archives older guidelines for parameters that are no longer found in our drinking water at concentrations of concern to human health (e.g., certain pesticides that are no longer used in Canada).

The lingo: guidelines, technical documents, guidance documents

The CDW establishes formal guidelines only for contaminants that meet three criteria, namely where

  • exposure to the contaminant could adversely affect health;
  • the contaminant is likely found in a “large number” of drinking water supplies across the country; and
  • it is or could be expected to be detected at a level that is possibly significant to health.

Where a contaminant does not meet all three criteria, the CDW may elect not to set a formal numerical guideline or develop the Guideline Technical Document (GTD), which sets out supporting scientific and technical documentation for each parameter.[6]

However, the CDW may develop a Guidance Document for contaminants or specific issues that do not meet these criteria, and has done so in several instances.[7] Such documents provide operational or management guidance relating to specific issues (e.g., issuing boil water advisories, controlling corrosion in distribution systems) or set out risk assessment information (e.g., potassium that enters our water supply from water softeners).[8] These documents are intended to be used by drinking water authorities for information about contaminants, and to provide guidance in case of spills or other emergencies. The process for Guidance Documents includes public consultations, as is the case for GTDs.

How are guidelines established?

Consultation documents are first published on Health Canada’s website for public comment.[9] At the time of writing, the only current consultation posted is a proposed GTD for certain enteric protozoa Giardia and Cryptosporidium, which are transmitted via feces and may cause severe diarrhea and dehydration, among other symptoms. The document provides a comprehensive review of the health risks associated with exposure to these pathogens, evaluates recent studies and suggests approaches to reducing concentrations of these pathogens in drinking water, and acceptable level of risk. Following a review of comments received during consultation, the CDW will establish a Drinking Water Guideline for these parameters, if required.[10]

Several GTDs that should soon be posted for public comment are listed in the Guideline summary. These include ammonia (which currently has no numerical guidelines), as well as other parameters for which MACs were established as far back as 1986, and require review: carbon tetrachloride, chromium, fluoride, turbidity and vinyl chloride. Take a look at these – remember, it’s all about what’s in your drinking water.

[1] A summary table is available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/water-eau/2010-sum_guide-res_recom/sum_guide-res_recom-eng.pdf

[2] Ontario government. Drinking water information – about arsenic in drinking water. April 2007. At  http://www.ontario.ca/drinkingwater/158463.pdf

[3] Government of Nova Scotia- Drinking water quality and treatment. Canadian drinking water quality guidelines. At http://www.gov.ns.ca/nse/water/waterquality.asp. See also A Guide For Municipal Water Works On How The Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality Are Implemented In Nova Scotia at http://www.gov.ns.ca/nse/water/docs/GuideonGuidelinesforCanadianDrinkingWaterQuality.pdf

[4] i.e., from 0.05 mg/L to 0.005 mg/L.

[5] Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Supporting Documentation – Trichloroethylene. May 2005 at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/water-eau/trichloroethylene/Guidelines%20for%20Canadian%20Drinking%20Water%20Quality.pdf

[6] The Guideline Technical Documents are also developed by the Committee, and are available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/index-eng.php#tech_doc .  These used to be called Guideline Supporting Documents.

[7] Guidance Documents are available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/index-eng.php#guidance

[8] For background on Guidance Documents, see, for example, Guidance on Controlling Corrosion in Drinking Water Distribution Systems at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/corrosion/index-eng.php

[9] At http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/consult/index-eng.php#water

[10] At http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/consult/_2010/giardia-cryptosporidium/giardia-cryptosporidium-eng.pdf

News & Views


The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

Consumer class actions and products to watch for

Class actions can be a way to hold large companies to account when their products fall short…

The case for punitive damages

In the realm of injury law, the term “punitive damages” often emerges, surrounde…