519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

In Ontario, the law recognizes the relevance of social media content in personal injury cases. This means a plaintiff may be required to provide to the defendant any posts, photos, or other information on their social media accounts that may be relevant to the case, such as details about their physical or mental condition, activities, or lifestyle.

Recently, the court dealt with the issue of media disclosure in Mohamud v. Juskey, 2023 ONSC 4414. The case set parameters for the extent to which plaintiffs’ social media accounts are required to be shared with defendants.

The facts of the case were that the plaintiff, Ms. Mohamud, was involved in a motor vehicle accident. She claimed damages for injuries she suffered. During the litigation process, the defendant, Mr. Juskey, sought disclosure of the entire contents of Ms. Mohamud’s Facebook and Instagram accounts. Ms. Mohamud refused to make this disclosure.  

Plaintiff’s argument

Ms. Mohamud argued that her social media accounts contained private and personal information unrelated to the motor vehicle accident, and therefore she should not be required to disclose them. She stated that such a request constituted an unreasonable intrusion on her personal privacy.

Defendant’s argument

Mr. Juskey argued that there was good reason to believe that the photographs on Ms. Mohamud’s social media accounts would give insight into Ms. Mohamud’s lifestyle and activities, and therefore the accounts were relevant in assessing the extent of Ms. Mohamud’s injuries and their impact on her daily life.


After a review of the portions of Ms. Mohamud’s Facebook and Instagram accounts that were available to the public, the court agreed that it was likely her private Instagram and Facebook accounts included post-accident photographs of Ms. Mohamud that depict her ability to engage in a variety of activities and were therefore relevant to the litigation.

Despite that relevance, the court agreed that a blanket request for access to all social media content would be overly invasive and infringe on privacy rights.

Having not seen the photographs on Ms. Mohamud’s private social media accounts, the court held that it could not decide which photos were relevant. Ms. Mohamud was ordered to produce a complete list of the photographs in her possession, control, or power – including those on her social media accounts – that were relevant to the live issues in the proceeding. She was not required to produce the entirety of her social media accounts.

Key takeaway

Mohamud v. Juskey demonstrates how information shared on social media can have implications in legal proceedings. However, this does not necessarily mean that the plaintiff has to share the entire contents of their social media account. The defendant must provide a compelling argument as to why the content they’re requesting is directly related to the case. Mere speculation or fishing expeditions are not sufficient grounds for requesting disclosure. The defendant should narrow their requests to specific timeframes and keywords that are directly related to the case.

If you are undergoing a personal injury lawsuit, consulting with a lawyer about what you are required to disclose is critical. You should not be required to reveal aspects of your life that aren’t relevant to the litigation.

Lauren Cullen practices with the Siskinds Personal Injury Law department. If you have questions about the information contained within this article or any other personal injury questions, please write to [email protected] or call 519-660-7826.

News & Views


The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

The dangers of drip pricing: Shining a spotlight on hidden fees

When a consumer chooses to make a purchase based on a price displayed, they should be able t…

Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits on the rise in North America

Suboxone is a medication containing buprenorphine, which is a first-line treatment for opioi…