519 672 2121

We are shocked and devastated by the senseless crime motivated by hatred and racism that was committed in our community on June 6. We extend our deepest condolences to the friends and family of those who were killed, and wish a full recovery to the surviving young boy who remains in hospital. We stand in solidarity with our Muslim partners, colleagues, clients, friends, and neighbours in rejecting Islamophobia in all forms, and demanding better for our community. Hatred has no place here. It diminishes every one of us. Each of us shares the responsibility for putting an end to it. We recognize that as members of the legal profession, our share of that responsibility is heightened. This unspeakable crime strikes at the very core of the Muslim community’s sense of security and will have a lasting impact. Although this tragedy can never be undone, we believe the goodness in our city will prevail. We commit to be better for each other, to demand better from each other and to share love, kindness and tolerance with one another. We must stand together to build a safer, more inclusive community for all.

Close mobile menu

The Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change is now considering public comments on its latest approvals reform proposal: moving many permits to take water to the “permit by rule” approach of the Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR). The next EASR proposal, for end of life vehicle management, is due later this month.

The theory of EASR is that many environmental activities have routine, predictable impacts and always obtain permits with essentially the same conditions. These activities can automatically be allowed to proceed, on standard conditions, by registering with the Ministry, without waiting many months for a Ministry employee to impose those same conditions. The EASR conditions can still be enforced the same way as a permit, through complaints and/or proactive inspections.

In addition, a senior official of the organization carrying on the activity must certify that they are complying with the conditions. Sooner or later, the Ministry will prosecute someone for signing such a certificate when it wasn’t true, which may incent greater attention to detail.

The proposed permits to take water exemptions are mostly about construction projects, which disrupt water but don’t consume it. These seem to fall into the “predictable” category, in that they shouldn’t usually have material effects on water quantity. As to water quality, hopefully, the Ministry will tighten up the rules on preventing erosion and sedimentation during construction before the EASR regulation is released; the draft technical paper seems much too relaxed on this front.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

The SCC’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act Decision: A win for climate change protection, but what’s next?

On March 25, 2021 the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision References re Gree…

The future of remote work: Important employer considerations

For many employers, the last 15 months has been a forced experiment on whether large segment…