519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

In St. Mary’s Cement v. Clarington (Municipality), 2011 ONSC 4631, an industrially zoned, operating cement company proposed to supplement its fuel with alternative fuel derived from recycled materials. Alternative fuels are used as fuel extensively in US and UK cement kilns, but they are not typical in Ontario. The municipality argued this would constitute operating a waste disposal area, which was not permitted by the zoning bylaw.

The court found that burning alternative fuels (within the EPA definition of waste) equalled the introduction of a new and additional landuse  i.e. disposing of industrial waste. This, it ruled, was not permissible under the doctrine of legal non-conforming use.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

What does it mean to witness a document?

The pandemic has changed how the world does business. People can buy, sell, and contract wit…

Considerations when choosing a medical malpractice lawyer

Medical malpractice occurs when a patient suffers injury or harm as a result of the negligen…