519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

We continue to mull over Smith v. Inco, and the major implications that has for virtually all cases involving Rylands v. Fletcher, and for a significant number of nuisance cases.  Watch our video on the case, made in cooperation with Nimonik. Then please let us know what you think.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

Sexual Assault Awareness Month: Supporting survivors in London, Ontario

May is Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM). SAAM is observed each May to raise awareness a…

The meaning of “consent” – the focal point of the Hockey Canada case

The legal definition of consent is clear: it must be a voluntary, affirmative, and ongoing a…