519 672 2121
Close mobile menu

More than 40 years ago, Mr. Justice McRuer’s Royal Commission Inquiry into Civil Rights concluded that no one should be subject to government discretion without a right of appeal. Ever since, this has been a central feature of Ontario administrative law. But in regulation 419/05, the new air regulation under the Environmental Protection Act, it has been forgotten.
The Ministry of the Environment interprets Reg. 419/05  as giving the Director a vast, untrammelled discretion to control how the regulation is applied, regardless of the facts or the accuracy of the of the Director’s approach. Although the consequences for affected companies can be very substantial, no reasons need be given, and there is no appeal. This is unreasonable and unfair. In accordance with legal principles established by Chief Justice McRuer, the Director should be obliged to give reasons, and his/her decisions should be subject to appeal to the Environmental Review Tribunal.

The proposed new section 13.1 will make the problem worse. It expressly gives the Director power to make ad hoc decisions on the application of the models, without giving any justification;  again, there is no appeal.

Decisions on modelling details may seem too technical to worry about, but they allow the Director to find many  organizations in breach of the regulation, with potentially enormous consequences. They do matter.

News & Views

Blog

The more you understand, the easier it is to manage well.

View Blog

Neurological imaging to prove brain injury in medical negligence litigation

A brain injury is when cell death occurs in the brain, which can affect an individual’s capa…

Take note: employers may be responsible for paying CPP and EI premiums on employee tips and gratuities

According to a recent Federal Court of Appeal decision, employers who receive electronic tip…