Site icon Siskinds Law Firm

Updates to medical assistance in dying

On March 17, 2021, the federal government brought into force changes to the law regarding medical assistance in dying. These changes are effective immediately.

The major change is the removal of the requirement that a person’s natural death be reasonably foreseeable in order to be eligible. The changes also introduce a two-track approach with different procedural safeguards depending on whether the person’s natural death is reasonably foreseeable or not.

All individuals seeking medical assistance in dying must meet the following criteria:

The process remains largely the same for individuals whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable. The patient must still make a written request for medical assistance in dying. A doctor or nurse practitioner can determine if the eligibility requirements are met, and then a second doctor or nurse practitioner must complete second assessment to confirm that the patient meets the requirements. The changes to the legislation eliminate the ten day waiting period between the request for the procedure and when the procedure can occur has been eliminated, and only one independent witness needs to sign the request where previously two witnesses were required. Independent witnesses can also now include health care providers or personal support workers who provide care to the person.

For those whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable there are new and modified safeguards in place including:

Individuals who suffer solely from mental illness do not meet the definition required for a grievous and irremediable medical condition, but this part of the legislation will be reviewed after 24 months.

One final major change to the legislation is that the procedure may still be undertaken in the event that a person whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable loses capacity to consent between the time the procedure was requested and the time it is carried out. Previously, the person had to be capable of consenting at both points in time. This is no longer required provided that all of the other criteria were met and the person entered into a written arrangement with the medical practitioner that the substance would be administered on a specified day and in that written arrangement the person consented to the administration of the substance even in the event that they had lost capacity in the meantime, the substance may still be administered so long as the person does not demonstrate, by words, sounds or gestures, refusal to have the substance administered or resistance to its administration. However, a person whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable must still be capable at both points in time and it remains the case that a substitute decision maker, such as an attorney for personal care, cannot consent to the procedure on the person’s behalf.

Laura Geddes practices with the Siskinds Wills & Estates department. If you have questions about the information contained within this article or any other questions about your will or estate, please write to laura.geddes@siskinds.com or call 519.660.7714.

Exit mobile version