Site icon Siskinds Law Firm

Privacy pulse: Federal privacy law bill, privacy law damages, and more

Image of a woman looking at a laptop with Siskinds LLP logo in bottom left corner.

This summer and spring brought important developments in privacy and access to information laws.

Freedom of information

July 1, 2026 – Amendments to the Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) came into force that include:

Certain related amendments were also made to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA).

Federal privacy legislation

June 15, 2026 – The federal government introduced a bill to modernize Canadian privacy law and enact the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act (PPCDA). The PPCDA would replace the privacy provisions of the currently in force Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (known as PIPEDA). The bill is in first reading in the House of Commons and is likely to be amended throughout the parliamentary process. The bill follows previous parliamentary attempts to reform Canadian privacy law in 2020 and 2022. The bill contains variations from the 2020 and 2022 documents. Relative to PIPEDA, the most significant changes are:

The PPCDA would bring Canadian federal privacy law into closer alignment with the standards set by European privacy law and with Quebec’s provincial privacy legislation.

Privacy law civil damages

May 26, 2026 – The Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded damages of $21.5 million for the privacy civil wrong of “intrusion upon seclusion” (as well as $1 million in punitive damages) to a class of about 7,000 patients in the case of J.C. et al. v. Jugenburg et al. In that case, the defendant plastic surgeon had installed surveillance cameras in consultation rooms, pre- and post-operation areas, and in operating rooms.

Customer accounts and privacy compliance

March 5, 2026 – The federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) issued findings that Loblaws had failed to comply with PIPEDA with respect to PC Optimum customer accounts. The OPC found that Loblaws retained personal information longer than necessary by reason of a) failing to delete accounts within a reasonable time after customers requesting account closure, and b) applying insufficient measures to anonymize personal information in customer accounts after closure rather than deleting or truly anonymizing the information. The OPC’s findings also related to individuals’ right to raise privacy concerns with a business in relation to the business’s privacy policies and procedures.

Your path to compliance starts here

To discover how Siskinds can assist you in meeting your privacy compliance needs, or if you have any questions related to this blog post, contact a lawyer on our Siskinds’ Privacy, Cyber & Data Governance Team.

Exit mobile version