Share | Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter See us on Youtube

Yet Another Reporting Obligation for Businesses

When will it end? Many of our clients are becoming increasingly frustrated with the imposition of onerous statutory obligations. And now the Ontario Divisional Court has added another to the pile.
Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Actrequires that a critical injury, which includes a fatality or a risk of fatality, a loss of consciousness, substantial blood loss, the fracture of a leg or arm, amputation of a leg, arm or foot, burns to a major portion of the body, or loss of sight in an eye, must be reported immediately to the Ministry of Labour. The site of the injury must not be altered or interfered with until a Ministry inspector has completed an inspection. Employers are (or should be!) aware of this requirement as part of their obligation to protect workers.
However, in 2007, a guest drowned in a swimming pool at Blue Mountain Resort. A Ministry of Labour inspector took the position that the incident constituted a critical injury which should have been reported to the Ministry, despite the fact that the victim was a guest of the resort, not an employee. When it reviewed the Ministry’s decision, the Ontario Labour Relations Board agreed. On judicial review to the Divisional Court, the Divisional Court agreed with the OLRB, finding that because the injury occurred in a workplace, the Ministry of Labour should have been advised, as hazards in the workplace are presumed to put workers at risk.

Temporary Layoffs: A Lesson for Unwary Employers

While watching a professional development webcast for employment lawyers last month, what stuck in my mind was that I needed to blog about temporary layoffs.

Why, you ask?  Well, after practicing employment law for the past 12 years, I have come to realize how few employers understand their potential exposure when placing non-unionized employees on temporary layoffs.  Employers generally assume that, if they follow the temporary layoff provisions in the applicable employment standards legislation, they will be fine.  Unfortunately, this is not always the case.

To explain, here is a brief 101 on temporary layoffs:
 
1.       Most employment standards legislation (like Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, 2000) allows employers to place employees off work on unpaid temporary layoffs for certain maximum periods.  Once the applicable maximum period has been reached without a recall to work, the employment relationship is considered to be “terminated” and/or “severed”, as the case may be.  Only then is the employee entitled to termination and/or severance pay under that legislation.
 
2.       In contrast, employers do not have the automatic right to place employees off work on unpaid temporary layoffs under our common laws.  It is up to the employer, under common law, to prove that there is an express term (e.g. verbal or written agreement by employee) or an implied term (e.g. employee notified or warned of possible unpaid temporary layoffs; employee placed on temporary layoffs in past; employee aware of temporary layoffs in past of employees in same or similar positions; established industry practice of temporary layoff; temporary layoff policies; etc.) in its contract of employment with the employee being placed on temporary layoff that allows for such temporary layoff.
 
3.       When there is no such express or implied right under common law, a non-unionized employee may – often through his lawyer – take issue with the temporary layoff, claiming that it was a constructive dismissal (e.g. a unilateral and fundamental change by the employer to the employment relationship) and seeking damages for the resulting constructive dismissal.
                                                                                                                            [Read More...]

linkedin linkEmail Chris
Chris has been practicing labour and employment law for over 25 years. This would explain the hair colour.

linkedin linkEmail Mary Lou
Partner and avid book club member.  Truth be told, very little of her book club’s discussion is ever about the book!

linkedin linkEmail Beth
After several years of working towards a career in midwifery,  realized she had been focusing on the wrong kind of “labour”.

linkedin linkEmail Andrea
Closet comedienne and relieved Bay Street transplant.

Browse through past ARTICLE ARCHIVES